Many sitters tend to get very excited and are extremely impressed with the ability of an accurate psychic that can pick up information surrounding the sitters, their past and present situations and also their loved ones in the Spirit World. This response to accurate evidence and the trust building that it supports, while welcome can easily become misused or abused by an unscrupulous intermediate. The article talks of how inexperienced psychics and San Diego Medium can mislead a sitter.
Probably the most controversial type of mediums is those that purport to be able to demonstrate "live" manifestations of deceased people and spiritual beings on the other side. As wild and wacky and even crazy as this sounds... There have been many physical intermediates that have been studied under close scientific scrutiny, and who have demonstrated things that are so mind-bogglingly unbelievable that they are hard to even to write!
It is true that a very competent intermediate is sometimes able to receive information about the sitter's future from the Spirit World. However, an inexperienced or unscrupulous intermediate, sensing the sitter's vulnerability and their willingness to believe whatever they say, may decide to make up forecasts regarding the sitter's future even though they have not received information from the Spirits. They may do this to keep the sitter impressed with their skill.
An unscrupulous medium may fib or exaggerate over what information and the type of contact they are capable of making. They may even go as far as claiming they are linking with the sitter's deceased loved ones and giving the impression that they are in contact with the Spirit World. Psychics and Mediums are naturally good observers, and they can use that particular skill to get clues and fish for information by observing people's reactions and body language.
In addition to observing body language and reactions, psychics can get cues about their sitters by "tuning into" to their sitters' aura. They can pick up information about the sitters' deceased loved ones, for example, their names, personality, shared memories, etc., without actually connecting with spirits in the spirit world. However, uninformed sitters being impressed by this display would naturally assume that the psychic is in contact with their deceased loved ones in the spirit world.
This misleading or deceptiveness is not only unfair to the sitter, but is damaging to the profession and other intermediates. As a intermediate myself, I'm very keen to witness how other professional work with the spirit world, and have been fortunate enough to have had quite a few sittings with proficient and principled intermediates.
Nevertheless, before I came into spiritualism, I had several readings from some "famous psychics" and had had unpleasant experiences. One devious and dodgy tactic used was that they would immediately ask questions about my life situation and from what I said they would conclude my future life. They said, for example, that I would get divorced within one year which didn't happen.
Mental Mediumship! This is the type of reading I prefer, and have had amazing, exciting and enlightening experiences with personally, for well over a decade in my own life. A mental one would be someone like John Edward, or George Anderson, or any of the better known psychic we see on TV. Mental is very evidential to me and can give you proof that your loved one's continue on... In a way that isn't weird, creepy or hard to wrap your brain around when the session is over.
Probably the most controversial type of mediums is those that purport to be able to demonstrate "live" manifestations of deceased people and spiritual beings on the other side. As wild and wacky and even crazy as this sounds... There have been many physical intermediates that have been studied under close scientific scrutiny, and who have demonstrated things that are so mind-bogglingly unbelievable that they are hard to even to write!
It is true that a very competent intermediate is sometimes able to receive information about the sitter's future from the Spirit World. However, an inexperienced or unscrupulous intermediate, sensing the sitter's vulnerability and their willingness to believe whatever they say, may decide to make up forecasts regarding the sitter's future even though they have not received information from the Spirits. They may do this to keep the sitter impressed with their skill.
An unscrupulous medium may fib or exaggerate over what information and the type of contact they are capable of making. They may even go as far as claiming they are linking with the sitter's deceased loved ones and giving the impression that they are in contact with the Spirit World. Psychics and Mediums are naturally good observers, and they can use that particular skill to get clues and fish for information by observing people's reactions and body language.
In addition to observing body language and reactions, psychics can get cues about their sitters by "tuning into" to their sitters' aura. They can pick up information about the sitters' deceased loved ones, for example, their names, personality, shared memories, etc., without actually connecting with spirits in the spirit world. However, uninformed sitters being impressed by this display would naturally assume that the psychic is in contact with their deceased loved ones in the spirit world.
This misleading or deceptiveness is not only unfair to the sitter, but is damaging to the profession and other intermediates. As a intermediate myself, I'm very keen to witness how other professional work with the spirit world, and have been fortunate enough to have had quite a few sittings with proficient and principled intermediates.
Nevertheless, before I came into spiritualism, I had several readings from some "famous psychics" and had had unpleasant experiences. One devious and dodgy tactic used was that they would immediately ask questions about my life situation and from what I said they would conclude my future life. They said, for example, that I would get divorced within one year which didn't happen.
Mental Mediumship! This is the type of reading I prefer, and have had amazing, exciting and enlightening experiences with personally, for well over a decade in my own life. A mental one would be someone like John Edward, or George Anderson, or any of the better known psychic we see on TV. Mental is very evidential to me and can give you proof that your loved one's continue on... In a way that isn't weird, creepy or hard to wrap your brain around when the session is over.
About the Author:
You can get excellent tips for picking a San Diego medium and more information about a reliable medium at http://www.thespiritualpsychic.com/psychic-medium-tarot-astrological-readings right now.
No comments:
Post a Comment