Wednesday, April 13, 2016

What To Know About Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

By Margaret Bailey


Advancements in technology are leading to the invention of better and new approaches to surgical procedures in all fields of medicine. Single incision laparoscopic surgery, often abbreviated as SILS also goes by several other names. Some of those names include Single-port laparoscopy (SPL), single-port incisionlless conventional equipment-using surgery, single-port access surgery (SPA), and Single-access endoscopic surgery. Additional names are natural-orifice trannsumbilical surgery (NOTUS), laparo-endoscopic singular-site surgery (LESS), and one-port umbilical surgery (OPUS).

SILS as a technique under laparoscopic surgery is still a relatively new idea with a rather short history. It falls under minimally invasive techniques of surgical operations because of its use of one incision point. In many patients, the navel serves as the entry point. Small scars are formed from the process. The small size of the scar is among the reasons for high preference of the method by patients and surgeons.

Entry points are either 11mm or 22 mm incisions. One incision is utilized to minimize scarring and pain felt during and after the process. The use of one incision is opposed to the traditional laparoscopic procedure that uses multiple entry points. There are some of the most highly qualified specialists in SILS in New York. Therefore, it is quite advisable to consider visiting the city when in search of specialists in this process.

There are two categories of specialized surgical equipment used by SILS. The two broad categories are hand instruments and access ports instruments. Access ports instruments are of various types including the GelPOINT system, QuadPort+, TriPort15, Uni-X, SILS device, and TriPort+. The manufacturers of these instruments are different.

On the contrary, hand instruments are made in three main configurations, that is, articulating, standard, and pre-bent rigid. Standard hand tools have been developed over a period of the last thirty years. Their design is rigid. Articulation hand instruments were made to solve problems in SPL reduced triangulation instrument.

A choice always has to be made between standard and articulating instruments by surgeons. Certain factors play a role in influencing that decision. Among those factors are cost, access port utilized, the level of training and skills commanded by the surgeon. It costs much more to use articulating instruments compared to using standard ones. However, the use of specialized tools promotes safety and efficiency.

The degree of awareness of SILS among surgeons is very high. However, the performance of SILS is limited to a few surgeons owing to its high level of complexity, limited space of access, and the use of specialized instruments. Surgical doctors who perform the procedure have to be highly skills and trained in surgical processes. That has promoted negative perception from the public and limited indulgence in the process.

A wide variety of surgeries makes use of SILS. Common examples comprise of sleeve gastrectomy, colectomy, adjustable gastric banding, appendectomy, nephrectomy, sacrocolpopexy, and hysterectomy among others. In European nations and the US, standard instruments are in wide usage when compared to specialized ones used in many other countries out of these two regions.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment